Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robert Leiser's avatar

Rephrased, that KPI could read “Not deliberately obstructing justice in an enquiry into our own awful conduct”. Possible replacement KPI would give senior management a bonus for “Number of kittens not thrown into a canal”

Expand full comment
andrew neville's avatar

The KPI itself is clearly stated including the statement that all information had been supplied on time, had allowed the inquiry to finish on time inline with expectations and this was agreed by the Chair of the Inquiry. It is hard to see how anyone at the Post Office involved in the preparation of the Accounts, the Remuneration Committee and those receiving the award could believe that not one of those statements was false. At the least, no document on the face of the earth will tell us that the inquiry has completed

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts