Simon Clarke can probably consider himself lucky that he never actually prosecuted a Post Office case, having called a halt to Samra. But CK's neglience needs to examined in the inquiry report.
Has the Enquiry undertaken a sequential analysis of the number of cases where SPM accounts appeared to show a deficit? If not, shouldn't they do so, to discover whether the introduction of Horizon increased the apparent number of deficits, c'f the Shipman Enquiry.
1. CPR rules are very clear. Why didn't defence council raise the absence of a declaration from Jenkins' witness statements to show that he was not a reliable witness.
Simon Clarke can probably consider himself lucky that he never actually prosecuted a Post Office case, having called a halt to Samra. But CK's neglience needs to examined in the inquiry report.
Has the Enquiry undertaken a sequential analysis of the number of cases where SPM accounts appeared to show a deficit? If not, shouldn't they do so, to discover whether the introduction of Horizon increased the apparent number of deficits, c'f the Shipman Enquiry.
1. CPR rules are very clear. Why didn't defence council raise the absence of a declaration from Jenkins' witness statements to show that he was not a reliable witness.