Impossible not to be angry after the Clarke and Altman evidence. There was no trace of an apology, no suggestion that what they did might have led or to any adverse consequences to anyone. And no remorse whatever even as Clarke almost laughingly taunted counsel about the “mistake” in his advice about disclosure. One wonders if any “mistakes” were made in the public interest immunity court application that no-one seems to have seen?
Thanks. It, and the papers upon which it was based, would make interesting reading. Given their disclosure obligations, I do wonder why it or at least some of it, has not already been disclosed.
Thank you for this excellent write-up. It is a sad and depressing thought that Altmann just didn't do a very good job in the first instance.
I think this what Mr Stein was (very gently) suggesting when he asked whether Altmann had much experience of prosecuting white collar crime (not much).
Impossible not to be angry after the Clarke and Altman evidence. There was no trace of an apology, no suggestion that what they did might have led or to any adverse consequences to anyone. And no remorse whatever even as Clarke almost laughingly taunted counsel about the “mistake” in his advice about disclosure. One wonders if any “mistakes” were made in the public interest immunity court application that no-one seems to have seen?
SWWs intervention in Clarke suggested they will get the transcript of the Pii hearing if it is still available.
Thanks. It, and the papers upon which it was based, would make interesting reading. Given their disclosure obligations, I do wonder why it or at least some of it, has not already been disclosed.
Thank you for this excellent write-up. It is a sad and depressing thought that Altmann just didn't do a very good job in the first instance.
I think this what Mr Stein was (very gently) suggesting when he asked whether Altmann had much experience of prosecuting white collar crime (not much).