Dear Richard, thank you for your usual pithy and insightful commentary. A couple of points if I may. Did I read somewhere recently that the SRA had weighed in on HSF role in the PO matter and that despite the spin this must have been a factor for HSF ‘resigning’ the brief or being fired by the PO. The other point is that I am horrified that any consideration is being given to bonuses for anyone at the PO despite an individual’s involvement or otherwise. There has to be collective responsibility at the corporate level and until this sorry saga is over bonuses should not even be a consideration; any such cash should go to compensate the aggrieved not the executives. Chris
Dear Richard, thank you for your usual pithy and insightful commentary. A couple of points if I may. Did I read somewhere recently that the SRA had weighed in on HSF role in the PO matter and that despite the spin this must have been a factor for HSF ‘resigning’ the brief or being fired by the PO. The other point is that I am horrified that any consideration is being given to bonuses for anyone at the PO despite an individual’s involvement or otherwise. There has to be collective responsibility at the corporate level and until this sorry saga is over bonuses should not even be a consideration; any such cash should go to compensate the aggrieved not the executives. Chris
keep up the good work thanks
Great insight Richard, thanks!
I didn't think anyone in their right mind would want to take on such a toxic client as POL, but I suppose someone has to!
Amazing insight as usual